Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 06, 2011

Noam Chomsky: Voice of Reason Without Rhetoric

Noam Chomsky speaks to BBC's Francine Stock at London's St Paul's Cathedral, Dec '02.

23min28sec


Next, an interesting interview with an (attempted) focus on religion but is quite varied. Always good to hear Chomsky asked about new topics so there is some new stuff here amongst some older material. In all fairness, Interviewer Zwicker has been somewhat controversial regarding 911 conspiracy assertions, but here he tries to find the core of Chomsky's basic thinking systems and really does not like his seemingly leftist defenses.

10min4sec

Sunday, July 01, 2007

USA Changes Its Name to LCD (Lowest Common Demoninator)

Digg This!Netscape BookmarkReddit BookmarkDel.icio.us Bookmark

America is soon to adopt a new acronym to replace USA. The new, easily remembered replacement will be LCD. The "dumbing down of America" is both the cause and the effect of our eventual destruction if we let it.

Sadly, though the citizens did not cause its own dumbing down; the corporatists, in an attempt to separate the intelligencia from the support of the people, has conditioned us to accept the best of the worst, a "lowest common denominator (LCD)" approach, like everything else in modern society. It is the source of the causes of our electing actors and idiots as Presidents, because they are as "ordinary as us", as opposed to celebrating brilliance. All of this is a consciousness that stupid people are more easily led, like rats into the sea following the pied piper.

If a basketball player has skills, we celebrate him; he scores more points; evidence of his superiority. Many never consider that the largest part of this is the superiority of his mind. They wrongly attribute this to his physical prowess, but somehow the tallest, most muscular player is not the highest scorer.

It appears many Americans would rather have a President with whom they could drink a beer and from whom they could hear a good joke, than to have one who knows how to improve their lives. It is not Mr. Bush's fault he is by far the least intelligent President to be elected in recent history. He is a product of the citizens and the devious puppet-masters who surround him. I am sure Mr. Bush is smarter than the average grocery store manager, but couldn't we have had higher expectations of the the requirements to become the "decider" for the world's only military superpower?

Regarding politics and even business, somehow it never occurs to many Americans that intelligence and logical persuasion are characteristics of an executive or lawyer that any of us would want to hire if we fully expect to win our cases, make more money and/or stay out of jail, yet somehow that has a taint when considering our number one legal and business minds in America. We have watched so many movies where emotionality won out over pure logical intelligence and truth, that we think demagoguery is the modern dogma of success. It never occurs to them, companies and the country should be run by the most intelligent, and that intelligence should feed our effective persuasion rather than weaponry and a loud mouth.

Then we wonder why the rest of the world laughs at us in the world frontier of policy and action. We have recently fallen from number one to number seven in a particularly important category:

U.S. falls from first to seventh place in global information technology ranking (Article)
This is a factor that will quickly translate into a poor economy for the USA/LCD. Somehow we have let anti-intellectual businesspersons convince us that there is a paramount value that something being profit driven/capitalistic is automatically going to make it superior. Now, by calling them "anti-intellectual" I am not saying they, themselves, are "stupid"; they just believe that keeping us that way will make them more money.

This may very well be true, in the short run, for those who became successful through inheritance instead of better ideas and hard work. The less intelligent the US is, the more we will celebrate the lazy, stupid sons of their fathers rise to the top as if they are royalty.

For example, it never occurs to many people that insurance companies are driven by profit, therefore the least likely to make decisions based on giving the best product for the lowest price. Their job is to spend the least by any means and to provide the very least. This is why America has the worst yet most expensive medical care among industrial nations. Some people will defend to the death, the right of insurance and pharmaceutical companies to make more money while providing less and less services to consumers.

After all, "profit is the measure of success" right? If I am CEO and I make a higher profit this year, you might assume I am the better businessman than the CEO who has a longterm plan for maximized profits. We have come to believe that making a million dollars overnight is preferable to making a billion over a period of ten years. Some couldn't tell you that 1- million is a thousand times lower than 1-billion. I can easily increase the profit of any company by selling off its most valuable assets all in one year while laying off its most experienced and highly paid middle managers. But this "instant results mentality" is killing America.

This is exactly how this super-corporation called America is being run today. We are allowing our executives to run up debt so they can pay themselves more and appease the impatient stockholders with a better standard of living, even if their actions will inevitably kill the goose that laid the golden egg, and I don't mean the company itself; I mean the consumers that support its growth.

Some may think it is a "conspiracy" but that would require greater intelligence than these overnight successes actually have. No, it is the system itself that has been ignored and abused. Anti-trust laws encourage the long-term health of a system; they are now intended to destroy profits but to guarantee that profits go to companies that make a better mousetrap instead of playing accounting games through mergers and acquisitions.

At he moment, America suffers from the bloat of having been number one for so long that it became a monopoly. Now, it acts like one; stifling innovation and shooting messengers of bad news. It has become the greatest incentivizer of saying "yes" to the boss and "no" to the employees, and refusing change. The worker or the citizen, in this case, has the greatest motive to steal from the supply room, and to blame failure on others. There is no reason for self-improvement, as that would just draw attention and make him a target of petty office politics, as it is much easier to shoot down ideas than to have them or promote them. Destruction is much easier than creation and invention.

In fact, to some, it would make the most sense to let things fall apart so they may more easily steal from the company as it falters. Using Katrina and New Orleans as a perfect example, despite the destruction of the city costing the larger corporation a huge fortune in the long run, it has made many companies a small fortune through the contracts of rebuilding it. So, the incentive was to let the levies fail knowing that reconstruction contracts would be very profitable to a few companies while costing the larger consumer base a huge loss.

It is time America become aware that it has a mental deficit, so that it may first choose to improve itself. You cannot possibly solve a problem until you see it "as a problem". We have to lay down our egos and admit we have become stupid, not looking for blame but realizing the cause of our current failure as a nation. Denial will do no good; it will only make things worse. If we realize there is such a problem, when is it appropriate to solve it? I have always heard, "NOW" was a good time.

Related Articles:
The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America
The Dumbing Down of America
Dumbing Down American Readers



Monday, June 04, 2007

Who's Afraid of Corporate Medicine?

Digg This!Netscape BookmarkReddit BookmarkDel.icio.us Bookmark


In the most recent Democratic Presidential Debate in New Hampshire, it was said and hardly heard when Candidate Dennis Kucinich screamed the most common sense yet most financially opposed medical plan, the single payer plan. Basically, an extension of Medicare to all Americans, it is a plan that would cut out the middle man, which is opposed by the sacred cows as Big Pharma, the AMA and insurance companies have effectively touted it as a death knell for quality medicine in America.

What they don't point out is that the death knell went in years ago as we are by far the worst quality medical providing nation of all industrialized nations. Yes, the best is available, but only to the rich but the real measure is the availability to all. On this the US loses in every category to countries like Costa Rica (population 3-million; avg. per capita income - $300/month) and Castro's Cuba (recently highlighted in Michael Moore's Sicko). The numbers are clear when by every measure America appears to be a third world nation.

We are 48th in life expectancy and the United States is tied with Hungary, Malta, Poland and Slovakia with a death rate of nearly 5 per 1,000 babies. A little embarrassing to those of us who still care about little things like children and living. Supposedly our constitution guarantees the "inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" ; however, it seems rather difficult to exercise these rights when you are dead.

Of course, many Americans have swallowed hook, line and sinker, the notion that insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and medical professional have a natural right to living like kings on the highest medical profits in the world. It's not hard to believe America falls for it after the billions that are tacked onto our medical care in the form of lobbying and advertising by the monster that our medical establishment has become.

Some facts to consider:

  • Medicare spends a lower percentage on administration of medical care than any single provider in the world at close to 1%.
  • A record 46.6 million Americans, including 8.3 million children, have no health insurance at all.
  • If allowed to actually negotiate with drug providers they could cut drug costs by 48% just as the Veteran's administration does; a fact few realize as our congress pushed this through literally in the middle of the night as Big Pharma twisted arms and threatened political lives during a prolonged vote. That's right; the median price difference for the 20 drugs most frequently used by seniors is 48.2 percent.

Some relevant questions:

  • If the US offered a free education to those who can perform, would there be any shortage of medical professionals?
  • If the US, a country of 300-million people cut out the middle man could we not cut out the middle man and save that 30+% of profit that is tacked onto our medical costs and put that money back in our pockets?
  • If we had a single payer i.e simply offering Medicare to all US citizens, couldn't we be at least as efficient as Cuba or Costa Rica?
  • If we treated people before they got sick wouldn't we live longer - as "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"?
  • Would we really miss any of the doctors, Pharma and insurance executives who might quit if we deprived them of guaranteed 6 figure incomes and replaced them with people driven by a love of helping people?
  • Would either doctors or patients miss the current bureaucracy of processing medical insurance claims and the fear that some executive will say, "no" to your life?
  • Would it somehow make us less American to get something back for the tax dollars we put in?
To paraphrase our former President, Richard Nixon, "you're not going to have America's healthcare system to kick around forever."

Thursday, May 10, 2007

See No Solution, Hear No Solution, Speak No Solution!

Digg This!Netscape BookmarkReddit BookmarkDel.icio.us Bookmark


These are extraordinary books by extraordinarily qualified authors. The most prolific researchers on Islam today, they still can't get a date with George W. Bush.

The conversant yet transcendent styles are accessible to all reading levels and should be required for all Americans who pretend to actually care about solving the problems that face us in the middle east.

Reza Azlan pens this pervasive book and just as it is complete, Vali Nasr finishes one more definitive book on the Shia Revival entitled the same, as a window the size of your living room into the problems and solutions for Iraq and surrounding Islamic nations. It is clear that our current administration has zero interest in actually ending this war, as their goal is not peace in the middle east, but profit from war.

Though it is clear the Islamic world sees no other way to get to heaven but by Allah, they certainly are not in agreement on what Allah looks like or how he wants his people to proceed. As the Shia and Sunni are much like Catholics and Protestants are to the Christian world, they are far too worried about how they will get along to worry about trying to convert the US or anyone else outside of the Middle East. Sure, they believe we will come around to their way of thinking but not by war but by revelation by their true God, Allah.

According to author Reza Azlan, if the US pulled out of Iraq immediately, the first thing that both the Shia and Sunni would agree on would be the elimination of Al Quaeda and the second would be to guarantee peace and stability to Iraq, as they care more about sustaining peace there than anyone in the US government. What is stopping us from following that advice? Well, maybe it has something to do with the absolute closed eyes and ears of the Whitehouse to anything that would stop the flow of money out of average American's hands into the Military Industrial Complex. This war is all about maintaining palatial Imperial Life in the Emerald City for the occupiers of this war torn country. But... that's another book.


Editorial Reviews

From The New Yorker
Aslan, a young Iranian emigrant, lucidly charts the growth of Islam from Muhammad's model community in Medina—depicted as a center of egalitarian social reform—through the chaotic contest to define the faith after the Prophet's death. Within generations, seven hundred thousand hadith—accounts of Muhammad's words and deeds—were in circulation, many "fabricated by individuals who sought to legitimize their own particular beliefs." Out of this muddle was born the primacy of the ulema, Islam's clerical establishment. The ulema, in Aslan's view, foreclosed Koranic interpretation, detoured from the Medinan ideal, and obscured Islam under a thicket of legalistic decrees. Fifteen centuries after Muhammad, Islam has reached the age at which Christianity underwent its reformation; Islam's renewal, Aslan attests, "is already here." However, both modernizers and their "fundamentalist" opposites call themselves reformers, and the victory of the former is not assured.
Copyright © 2005 The New Yorker

From Booklist
Aslan's introduction to the history of Islam, which also devotes several chapters to the place of Islam in the contemporary world, tackles its subject with serious and well-informed scholarship. But, miracle of miracles, it's actually pretty fun to read. Beginning with an exploration of the religious climate in the years before the Prophet's Revelation, Aslan traces the story of Islam from the Prophet's life and the so-called golden age of the first four caliphs all the way through European colonization and subsequent independence. Aslan sees religion as a story, and he tells it that way, bringing each successive century to life with the kind of vivid details and like-you-were-there, present-tense narration that makes popular history popular. Even so, the depth and breadth here will probably be a bit heavy for some, who might better enjoy Karen Armstrong's shorter, if less authoritative, Islam (2000). That said, this is an excellent overview that doubles as an impassioned call to reform. John Green
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

See all Editorial Reviews


Netscape BookmarkDigg This!Reddit BookmarkStumbleUpon BookmarkDel.icio.us BookmarkWindows live BookmarkYahoo MyWeb BookmarkGoogle BookmarkSpurl BookmarkAskJeeves BookmarkLinkaGoGo BookmarkLinkRoll BookmarkBackFlip BookmarkSquidoo BookmarkLinkArena BookmarkBlinkBits BookmarkJots BookmarkKinja BookmarkWink BookmarkTagtooga BookmarkBlueDot BookmarkTailRank BookmarkCare2 BookmarkMagnolia BookmarkCiteULike BookmarkClaimID BookmarkDZone BookmarkDiigo BookmarkEarthlink BookmarkFeedMeLinks BookmarkGravee Bookmarki89.com BookmarkIgooi BookmarkIndianPad BookmarkIgooi BookmarkMarkaBoo BookmarkMyLinkVault BookmarkNetvouz BookmarkSiteJot BookmarkSmarking BookmarkNing BookmarkRawSugar BookmarkSimpy BookmarkShadows BookmarkScuttle Bookmark
Non-English Bookmarks
Oknotizie BookmarkSegnalo BookmarkCorich BookmarkRootace BookmarkSphere BookmarkTechnorati BookmarkHatena BookmarkDrecom BookmarkBlogMemes BookmarkPingKing Bookmark

Related Posts with Thumbnails